Independent Trading Platform Intelligence

PLATFORM REVIEWIndependent Intelligence for Trading Platforms

Compare prop firm rules, broker costs, payout performance, and trading conditions using independent research, structured data, and practical tools.

Suggestions:
Continuous Audit Trail & Fact Verification

Platform Intelligence & Verified Updates

Factual trading rules, drawdown models, and payout terms derived directly from primary official sources and first-party empirical test observations.

Audit Standards & Taxonomy →
PlatformMaturityVerified Rules & LimitsPayout TermsObservation DateMonitoring StatusAudit
FTMO
MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5
Empirically Tested
Static• Max: 10%• Daily: 5%
No verified material change detected
14 days initialSep 25, 2026Verified from primary sourceAudit Record
Funding Pips
cTrader, Match-Trader
Research Verified
Static• Max: 10%• Daily: 5%
No verified material change detected
14 days initialSep 25, 2026Verified from primary sourceAudit Record
The5ers
MetaTrader 5 (MT5), The5ers Account MetriX Hub
Research Verified
Static• Max: 10%• Daily: 5%
No verified material change detected
14 days initialSep 25, 2026Verified from primary sourceAudit Record
DojoTraders
cTrader, DXtrade
Source Verified
Static• Max: 6%• Daily: 5%
No verified material change detected
14 days initialSep 26, 2026Source checkedAudit Record
Head-to-Head Evaluations

Popular Platform Comparisons

View all comparisons
Prop FirmVerified Data
FTMOvsThe5ers

Compare FTMO's 10% static loss buffer and documented payout processing against The5ers' milestone scaling plan and low-leverage rules.

FTMOStatic 10% Max Loss
The5ersStatic Max Loss (5%–10%)
Compare Rules & Settlement
Prop FirmVerified Data
FTMOvsFunding Pips

Compare FTMO's 10-year track record and 8h payout SLA against Funding Pips' lower evaluation fees and raw spread cTrader execution.

FTMOStatic 10% Max Loss
Funding PipsStatic 10% (2-Step) / Trailing 6% (1-Step Flex)
Compare Rules & Settlement
Prop FirmVerified Data
Funding PipsvsFundedNext

Evaluate ultra-low evaluation fees on cTrader versus FundedNext's 15% profit split during the challenge phase.

Funding PipsStatic 10% (2-Step) / Trailing 6% (1-Step Flex)
FundedNextBalance-Based Static
Compare Rules & Settlement
BrokerVerified Data
HFM (HF Markets)vsExness

Head-to-head comparison of SE Asia's two most popular brokers across VietQR settlement speed, zero spreads, and leverage.

HFM (HF Markets)15–45 min
Exness< 5 min (automated)
Compare Rules & Settlement
BrokerVerified Data
ExnessvsIC Markets

Compare instant automated weekend withdrawals against institutional ASIC-regulated raw spread liquidity.

Exness< 5 min (automated)
IC Markets1–2 business days
Compare Rules & Settlement
Our Research Standards

Independent Intelligence Built on Verification, Not Marketing

Prop firm marketing often conceals harsh trailing drawdowns, while broker portals hide high spread markups behind bonus promotions. Platform-Review acts as an independent auditor to give traders transparent, structured facts.

Independent Research

We do not sell ranking spots or accept sponsored commissions to alter safety scores or drawdown ratings.

Empirical Rule Testing

We independently audit evaluation rules, intraday trailing spikes, and withdrawal cycles on real accounts.

Structured Evidence

Every metric is corroborated against official legal disclosures, real payment gateways, and trading statements.

Explicit Timestamps

Trading rules change frequently. Every data point on Platform-Review includes an explicit verification date.

🏠Home⚡Prop Firms💹Brokers⚖️Compare🛠Tools